Are The People Of The U.S. Being Blinded By Political Double Dealing
I was checking through the NGO’s of the United Nations and came across this one and started wondering if this whole issue about homosexual and atheist leaders of the Boy Scouts is a trick. In order to become a NGO of the United Nation you pledge to further the agenda of the UN and they demand proof that you are doing so on a yearly basis. It must be helpful in a court case when everyone involved has given an oath to further the same United Nations agenda. With the ACLU, ABA, and Boy Scouts pledged to advance their agenda that is just what is happening. Once a precedent is set everyone abides by it or receives a threatening letter from the ACLU.
If there is any double dealing going on then it is quite convoluted as the California courts ruled in favor of the Boy Scouts. This could be because the ABA is weaker in California despite the apparent liberal bias of their courts. I might be wronging the California state court system and they may not have as much liberal bias as the California federal courts.
My sources are:
Source 1 is evidence of Boy Scouts NGO status
Source 2 is ACLU demanding public subsity of Boy Scouts end.
For more on the ACLU and The Boy Scouts see:
Source 3
Name:
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
Address:
1325 Walnut Hill Lane PO Box 152079 Irving TX 75015
UNITED STATES
Telephone:
Fax:
E-mail:
WEB Address:
Assosiation: Other NGOs associate with DPI
Main Activity: Youth
If there is any double dealing going on then it is quite convoluted as the California courts ruled in favor of the Boy Scouts. This could be because the ABA is weaker in California despite the apparent liberal bias of their courts. I might be wronging the California state court system and they may not have as much liberal bias as the California federal courts.
My sources are:
Source 1 is evidence of Boy Scouts NGO status
Source 2 is ACLU demanding public subsity of Boy Scouts end.
For more on the ACLU and The Boy Scouts see:
Source 3