Will Rhode Island Choose To Encourage This Violation Of The Right To Life And Health?
A lesbian couple who are citizens of Rhode Island have filed for divorce in that state after being “married” in Massachusetts. They were allowed to “marry” because a .Massachusetts judge exceeded in jurisdiction by acting as a legislator for Rhode Island.
The solution to this supposed conundrum is quite simple in that all Judge Jeremiah Jeremiah Jr. has to do is correctly interpret Rhode Island Law as Rhode Island law does not recognize homosexual “marriage” and if there is not marriage there is no need for a divorce.
This is because the only marriage Rhode Island law recognizes is between a man and a woman. The Massachusetts judge said the Rhode Island law did not latterly forbid the marriage of two individuals of the same sex which is correct as far as it goes but then it does not forbid a woman from marrying a dog or man from marrying a car. On the other hand it does not recognize any of these “marriages” which ends up forbidding them though not in actual words. This means the couple is only legally “married” in Massachusetts and must return there to get a divorce just like any other homosexual couple “married” in that far left state that encourages the violation of natural human rights.
The situation is that too many activist judges exist and Judge Jeremiah Jr. may well me one in which case his personal politics is more important than the law. There seems to be a lot of hoopla for such an open and shut case so I am concerned that he is an activist. Instead It may be he is just being careful to construct his argument considering the controversial nature of the case.
I wonder if this is one of the same couples whose “marriage” was legalized by that extremist Massachusetts judge just a few months ago.
Source 1 is about lesbian couple filing for “divorce”
The solution to this supposed conundrum is quite simple in that all Judge Jeremiah Jeremiah Jr. has to do is correctly interpret Rhode Island Law as Rhode Island law does not recognize homosexual “marriage” and if there is not marriage there is no need for a divorce.
This is because the only marriage Rhode Island law recognizes is between a man and a woman. The Massachusetts judge said the Rhode Island law did not latterly forbid the marriage of two individuals of the same sex which is correct as far as it goes but then it does not forbid a woman from marrying a dog or man from marrying a car. On the other hand it does not recognize any of these “marriages” which ends up forbidding them though not in actual words. This means the couple is only legally “married” in Massachusetts and must return there to get a divorce just like any other homosexual couple “married” in that far left state that encourages the violation of natural human rights.
The situation is that too many activist judges exist and Judge Jeremiah Jr. may well me one in which case his personal politics is more important than the law. There seems to be a lot of hoopla for such an open and shut case so I am concerned that he is an activist. Instead It may be he is just being careful to construct his argument considering the controversial nature of the case.
I wonder if this is one of the same couples whose “marriage” was legalized by that extremist Massachusetts judge just a few months ago.
Source 1 is about lesbian couple filing for “divorce”
posted by Kerwin | 7:05 PM
3 Comments:
If Rhode Island doesn't recognize same sex marriage I fail to see how they can recognize the divorce. New England is getting crazier all the time.
New Hampshire is a very conservative state that happened to vote for Kerry. I have no clue why they broke the mode on the Presidential race. The rest are either liberal or borderline liberal.
The media has been touting South Dakota as a conservative state but according to their nation politics in 2004 they prefer a moderate position. I mentioned this since I wonder how their voters referendum would have done in more conservative states like Kansas or Virginia. Virginia seems to have shifted left in the last election but I would still give it a try..
The statistics I have are not perfect since they use Republican party and Democratic party as the criteria so the DINOs and RINOs may cause them to be inaccurate. I do know New Hampshire has two pro life Senators.
and the circus begins..interesting post!...yea let them have to return to Massachussets..sounds logical to me!
Post a Comment
<< Home