Libertines Are Always Testing The Limits
I felt I should mention that some things are too libertine even for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals as this article on a ruling by the Nevada Supreme Court. The scary thing is that two of Nevada’s lower courts found what they called “"expressive conduct" in the constitution. That probably has something to do with the right to speech. The court wisely stated that even if it does apply it not absolute. I would like to see both that decision and the one in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals even though I have trouble believing the Ninth said any such thing.
Seattle on the other hands rejected a measure keeping dancers four feet away from patrons.
I am unsure what the legislators and others who propose these bills hope to do. I would really like to know the rational since I do not see them doing anything significant to curb sex entertainment.
The First Amendment can not be used to violate the purpose of the U.S. Constitution so there is a limit to any one of the freedoms it grants.
Source 1 is article about Nevada Supreme Court.
Seattle on the other hands rejected a measure keeping dancers four feet away from patrons.
I am unsure what the legislators and others who propose these bills hope to do. I would really like to know the rational since I do not see them doing anything significant to curb sex entertainment.
The First Amendment can not be used to violate the purpose of the U.S. Constitution so there is a limit to any one of the freedoms it grants.
Source 1 is article about Nevada Supreme Court.
posted by Kerwin | 11:16 PM
1 Comments:
Oregon is trying (or has succeeded by now) to keep public sex acts legal. I have to dig, but I believe it was the 9th Circuit that okayed the deal.
I'll tell you what: If the 9th Circuit won't even get on bored then you may have reached the height of moral depravity.
Post a Comment
<< Home