Science Without Ethics And The Slipper Slope Of America
Women are going to go crazy over this new advancement using adult stem cells. Using stem cells from a woman’s own fat researchers believe the will be able to construct new breast. This article states it is only for cancer patients but if I can see the potential of it being used for plastic surgery then so can other people.
This article shows a consistent media bias for research on stem cells made by cutting a baby in its first days of life up and using the body parts to do research on possible cures for other humans later in life. The designation stem cell though true is also a euphemism that hides what is actually occurring. Those who support the right to life of all human beings should avoid using it because it is deceptive. The media is even more deceptive as they refuse to make a distinction between those stem cell obtained from killing a human being in his or her early stage of life and those that are harvested form a human being but do not kill or significantly injure him or her.
For this reason the stem cell debate is on area in which the liberal bias of the main stream media is obvious.
The study I mention above is still in the animal testing phase and is farther advanced than embryonic which is in its hypothetical stage. I believe they have created a male gamete out of a cell from a chopped up baby early in its lifespan.
There is no reason that scientist could not be performing these studies using stem cells from chopped up animal babies instead of stem cells from chopped up human babies. If they succeed then they can get permission from the American people to kill human beings so they can heal other human beings. If the people gave them it would be a clear violation of the law of Nature and Nature’s God but our system allows for to tolerance of such tyranny.
The only reason I can believe that scientist have chosen a path of greater resistance is that they are challenging those that believe that all human beings have the right to life. Researchers have also proposed fusing a human child and a chimpanzee child which are both in the blastocyst stage of life thus killing both children to create a new offspring that was a combination of both known as a chimera. This would be unethical but some scientist do not believe ethics apply to them which pits them against what is called the religious right even though it contains Atheists in its numbers.
Source 1 Is about discovery in adult stem cells the could change the nature of plastic surgery involving human breasts.
Source 2 is about human chimpanzee chimera.
Source 3 mentions some interesting items about the nature of chimeras and our laws.
This article shows a consistent media bias for research on stem cells made by cutting a baby in its first days of life up and using the body parts to do research on possible cures for other humans later in life. The designation stem cell though true is also a euphemism that hides what is actually occurring. Those who support the right to life of all human beings should avoid using it because it is deceptive. The media is even more deceptive as they refuse to make a distinction between those stem cell obtained from killing a human being in his or her early stage of life and those that are harvested form a human being but do not kill or significantly injure him or her.
For this reason the stem cell debate is on area in which the liberal bias of the main stream media is obvious.
The study I mention above is still in the animal testing phase and is farther advanced than embryonic which is in its hypothetical stage. I believe they have created a male gamete out of a cell from a chopped up baby early in its lifespan.
There is no reason that scientist could not be performing these studies using stem cells from chopped up animal babies instead of stem cells from chopped up human babies. If they succeed then they can get permission from the American people to kill human beings so they can heal other human beings. If the people gave them it would be a clear violation of the law of Nature and Nature’s God but our system allows for to tolerance of such tyranny.
The only reason I can believe that scientist have chosen a path of greater resistance is that they are challenging those that believe that all human beings have the right to life. Researchers have also proposed fusing a human child and a chimpanzee child which are both in the blastocyst stage of life thus killing both children to create a new offspring that was a combination of both known as a chimera. This would be unethical but some scientist do not believe ethics apply to them which pits them against what is called the religious right even though it contains Atheists in its numbers.
Source 1 Is about discovery in adult stem cells the could change the nature of plastic surgery involving human breasts.
Source 2 is about human chimpanzee chimera.
Source 3 mentions some interesting items about the nature of chimeras and our laws.
posted by Kerwin | 10:05 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home