Are Republicans And Democrats United Against The Rule Of Law?
In California Democrat Loretta Sanzhez was born in American though she is of Hispanic decent. She is pro choice to murder your own children provided they are in your own womb. In California it is illegal to murder a unborn child over the age of 2 months or so from conception if they are not in your own womb. Location, age, and development are very important according to California Law.
Here Opponent is Tan Nguyen a survivor of America’s cowardly retreat from Vietnam and who also survived a long dangerous trip as a refuge. According to a survey with the California Pro Life Tan supports a child’s right to equal protection under the law and the right to life even if he or she is still in his or her mother’s womb.
The two also disagree on immigration policy with Tan a legalized citizen that obtained his own naturalized citizenship supporting a tough border solution and Loretta favoring the open border and amnesty for lawbreakers solution favored by President Bush and too many Senators. A victory for Tam would therefore be a defeat for the individuals of both parties who want to dispense with American’s right to rule themselves and control their own borders. It would also be a strike against the forces that support the ongoing genocide in the United States that kills 1.2 million or so people annually.
It seems a letter written in Spanish was sent our to 14,000 registered Democrats in District 47 of California where the race is taken place this letter made the statement that "You are advised that if your residence in this country is illegal or you are an immigrant, voting in a federal election is a crime that could result in jail time.". From what I understand the cry is this letter in that it could intimidate immigrants who are naturalized citizens of the United States. The defense is the letter is in Spanish so a translation error could well have occurred and the difference between the correct and incorrect wording is not that great and may be covered by the word “could”. We have not heard the letter writers defense for one reason or another.
What is happening is the Republican party is abandoning Tam which is not that surprising since he disagrees with Bush on border security and amnesty for those who break immigration laws and the GOP may not. Tam is also backing away from the letter stating that one of his campaign workers sent the message without his permission. This may be true as there is a split in the Republican campaign and the “misinterpretation” may well have been done intentionally just to cause a scandal. Since such potential bias exists the word of the County Republican chairman is worthless. I would like to say Tam should say the buck stops here but that same argument would make the President guilty for any crime committed by an America. If he knowingly committed or knew it was being committed and did not stop it then he should be held responsible. We will not know that until the ongoing investigation and any legal action is over and so in short Tam should have his day in court a point both Democrats and Republicans who respect the rule of law should be insisting on.
Source 1 is about the “scandal” involving Tam Nguyen.
Source 2 is about Tam’s early life.
Source 3 is about California Pro Life’s survey.
Here Opponent is Tan Nguyen a survivor of America’s cowardly retreat from Vietnam and who also survived a long dangerous trip as a refuge. According to a survey with the California Pro Life Tan supports a child’s right to equal protection under the law and the right to life even if he or she is still in his or her mother’s womb.
The two also disagree on immigration policy with Tan a legalized citizen that obtained his own naturalized citizenship supporting a tough border solution and Loretta favoring the open border and amnesty for lawbreakers solution favored by President Bush and too many Senators. A victory for Tam would therefore be a defeat for the individuals of both parties who want to dispense with American’s right to rule themselves and control their own borders. It would also be a strike against the forces that support the ongoing genocide in the United States that kills 1.2 million or so people annually.
It seems a letter written in Spanish was sent our to 14,000 registered Democrats in District 47 of California where the race is taken place this letter made the statement that "You are advised that if your residence in this country is illegal or you are an immigrant, voting in a federal election is a crime that could result in jail time.". From what I understand the cry is this letter in that it could intimidate immigrants who are naturalized citizens of the United States. The defense is the letter is in Spanish so a translation error could well have occurred and the difference between the correct and incorrect wording is not that great and may be covered by the word “could”. We have not heard the letter writers defense for one reason or another.
What is happening is the Republican party is abandoning Tam which is not that surprising since he disagrees with Bush on border security and amnesty for those who break immigration laws and the GOP may not. Tam is also backing away from the letter stating that one of his campaign workers sent the message without his permission. This may be true as there is a split in the Republican campaign and the “misinterpretation” may well have been done intentionally just to cause a scandal. Since such potential bias exists the word of the County Republican chairman is worthless. I would like to say Tam should say the buck stops here but that same argument would make the President guilty for any crime committed by an America. If he knowingly committed or knew it was being committed and did not stop it then he should be held responsible. We will not know that until the ongoing investigation and any legal action is over and so in short Tam should have his day in court a point both Democrats and Republicans who respect the rule of law should be insisting on.
Source 1 is about the “scandal” involving Tam Nguyen.
Source 2 is about Tam’s early life.
Source 3 is about California Pro Life’s survey.
posted by Kerwin | 9:55 PM
5 Comments:
The Dems are just business as usual. The Republicans are trying to moderate themselve, thinking this will score them points, not realizing that they're behind in polls because they abandoned their original principles.
The neoconservative platform does have some planks in common with the liberals which may explain the alliance between the two in Congress over certain issues such as immigration policy.
Has anyone read the FULL text of the letter? The Spanish original and a passable full translation are available at
http://maldef.org/pdf/AlbertoGonzales10172006.pdf
(following the cover letter to AG Al).
The first paragraph clearly states that if the recipient is a citizen, they SHOULD vote. The rest of the letter is for everyone ELSE.
It then goes on to explain that illegals and "emigrants" (from Mexico) are not entitled to vote.
NOTE: unlike natural-born Americans, naturalized immigrants (like Nellie and Benny Diaz) must have taken and passed a citizenship exam when they naturalized. If they are STILL not sure whether they are allowed to vote, they should seek medical help.
All the trash-talk about "voter intimidation" is without foundation. REMEMBER: There is an old-fashioned legal rule called the FIRST AMENDMENT. Tan Nguyen had an absolute right to say what he (apparently) did, whether or not to do so was smart national politics for his party.
Anomy,
Thank you for the information. It is easier to address you if you use a pseudonym that distinguishes you from others.
In this case my logic is fine but my extraneous use of the adjective unborn is bad sentence structure which causes unnecessary wordiness. Thank you for pointing it out so I can strive to compact by points and make them more readable.
Post a Comment
<< Home