The Disaster To Families Caused By The Federal Courts
37% of American babies are born out of wedlock but I am not complaining even though such children face a rough and dangerous childhood as both cohabitating and single parent relationships and more disruptive than married families. The reason I am not complaining is a large number of children conceived out of wedlock are deliberately and intentionally killed at the behest of their mothers before there are born.
This high number of children conceived out of wedlock is a natural result of the Supreme Courts decision to violate the separation of powers restriction in the U.S. Constitution. They either incompetently or intentionally ruled that the freedom of speech covered pornography. It is common sense that no one has the right to use their own rights to harm or injure others. Science has also presented enough evidence to show that pornography brings harm to other even if it is just in normalizing deviant behavior such as having sex out of wedlock. Even if there are competing theories which is questionable it is up to the legislation and not the judicial branch to choose which theory they favor.
The no fault divorce laws and the removal of laws against cohabitation and adultery or the refusal to enforce them have most likely contributed to this state of being. The courts have a job and that is to judge according to the law. It is not to make or remove laws that they object to for one or another arbitrary reasons.
Source 1 is about number of U.S. births that are out of wedlock.
This high number of children conceived out of wedlock is a natural result of the Supreme Courts decision to violate the separation of powers restriction in the U.S. Constitution. They either incompetently or intentionally ruled that the freedom of speech covered pornography. It is common sense that no one has the right to use their own rights to harm or injure others. Science has also presented enough evidence to show that pornography brings harm to other even if it is just in normalizing deviant behavior such as having sex out of wedlock. Even if there are competing theories which is questionable it is up to the legislation and not the judicial branch to choose which theory they favor.
The no fault divorce laws and the removal of laws against cohabitation and adultery or the refusal to enforce them have most likely contributed to this state of being. The courts have a job and that is to judge according to the law. It is not to make or remove laws that they object to for one or another arbitrary reasons.
Source 1 is about number of U.S. births that are out of wedlock.
3 Comments:
No fault divorce is the most ridiculous law I've ever heard of. Adultery use to be illegal, and still should be, even from a non-religious perspective. It is a legal contract, and if someone breaks it, there should be consequences.
You're bang on about the Supreme Courts decision to violate the separation of powers contributing the high number of children being born out of wedlock, and we could even take it further by attributing a lot of abortion to this concept as well.
hiya ..what an absolute shame and embarassment this should be to all of us...great read..ty.
Happy holidays!
Ignatus,
“Exposure prompted, among other things, greater acceptance of pre- and extramarital sex and greater tolerance of nonexclusive sexual access to intimate partners.” Journal of Family Issues.
You can get the rest of this scientific abstract at:
http://jfi.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/9/4/518
“Compared to batterers who do not use pornography and alcohol, the combination of alcohol and pornography does increase the odds of sexual abuse. “ Violence against Woman
You can see this abstract of a study at
http://vaw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/10/1/56
Post a Comment
<< Home