The Front Men For The United Nations Attack On The Liberty Of The United States
The United Nation makes a point of attacking America using superfine and front men. The front men in the case of Hazleton’s Illegal Immigration Relief Act are the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund and the American Civil Liberties Union(ACLU) who are both non government organizations connected to the United Nations. A third one who is not mentioned but who is seldom if even missing from legal procedures is the American Bar Association.
The United Nations is an advocate of open borders and migrant rights. We signed on the 1951 treaty that established the “International Organization of Migration”. that like many international treaties we signed compromise our ability to rule ourselves. This is an effect of removing the state legislatures ability to check the federal government by passing the Seventeenth Amendment.
The Hazleton case is not the only case in which the United Nation is attacking the freedom of the People of the United States. Another instance is the Mount Soledad case. The Jewish War Veterans of the United States is another NGO that is in partnership with the United Nation. They and the ACLU along with some independents are taking the case to a federal court that is under a monopoly or near monopoly of judges that are ABA members and influenced by ABA propaganda.
I am sure there are other cases in which this same thing has happened. I would like to direct your attention to one other area of corruption and that is judges like Ruth Bader Ginsburg who belong to groups that compromise the security of the United States such as the Council of Foreign Relation. It is not up to judges to devise foreign policy that is the domain of the legislative and executive branches. It is certainly not up to judges to rule in accordance to federal law since all legislation has to be passed by Congress. Ginsburg who has a pass history in leadership within both the ABA and the ACLU will be anything but impartial when either of these cases comes before her. I know there are other judges on the bench that are as biased as her.
Source 1 is about Hazleton and it lawsuit and seems to be biased for illegal immigration.
Source 2 is about the Mt Soledad lawsuit.
Source 3 is the connection of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education to the United Nations.
Source 4 is a list of NGO’s in partnership with the United Nations that include the ACLU, The ABA, and the Jewish War Veterans of the United States .
Source 5 is a short biography of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Source 6 is a membership list of the Council of Foreign Affairs. I did not use this but it can be used to find our if a judges perceived impartiality is possibly compromised.
The United Nations is an advocate of open borders and migrant rights. We signed on the 1951 treaty that established the “International Organization of Migration”. that like many international treaties we signed compromise our ability to rule ourselves. This is an effect of removing the state legislatures ability to check the federal government by passing the Seventeenth Amendment.
The Hazleton case is not the only case in which the United Nation is attacking the freedom of the People of the United States. Another instance is the Mount Soledad case. The Jewish War Veterans of the United States is another NGO that is in partnership with the United Nation. They and the ACLU along with some independents are taking the case to a federal court that is under a monopoly or near monopoly of judges that are ABA members and influenced by ABA propaganda.
I am sure there are other cases in which this same thing has happened. I would like to direct your attention to one other area of corruption and that is judges like Ruth Bader Ginsburg who belong to groups that compromise the security of the United States such as the Council of Foreign Relation. It is not up to judges to devise foreign policy that is the domain of the legislative and executive branches. It is certainly not up to judges to rule in accordance to federal law since all legislation has to be passed by Congress. Ginsburg who has a pass history in leadership within both the ABA and the ACLU will be anything but impartial when either of these cases comes before her. I know there are other judges on the bench that are as biased as her.
Source 1 is about Hazleton and it lawsuit and seems to be biased for illegal immigration.
Source 2 is about the Mt Soledad lawsuit.
Source 3 is the connection of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education to the United Nations.
Source 4 is a list of NGO’s in partnership with the United Nations that include the ACLU, The ABA, and the Jewish War Veterans of the United States .
Source 5 is a short biography of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Source 6 is a membership list of the Council of Foreign Affairs. I did not use this but it can be used to find our if a judges perceived impartiality is possibly compromised.
posted by Kerwin | 6:34 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home