The Right To Life And Health Threatened In Rhode Island By A Massachusetts Judge
Here is an action from an activist state judge the said homosexual pseudo marriages are allowed in Massachusetts that involve Rhode Island couples as Rhode Island does not expressly prohibit gay pseudo marriages. First the judge does not have the right to rule what is legal and what is not legal in Rhode Island because it is not his jurisdiction. Second the question of course is not if Rhode Island prohibits them but whether or not Rhode Island recognizes them after all Rhode Island does not recognize a marriage between a women and her dog or between a man and his car either.
The judge is ignoring the intent of both the Rhode Island law which stresses marriage between a bride and a groom and Massachusetts law which is meant not to interfere with another states laws and put his own spin on both. That should be an impeachable offense as it is obviously a mark of bad behavior which you do not want in any official position especially the judicial branch.
The idea that Governor Romney has to enforce the court ruling as advocated by Michele Granda is contrary to the idea of separation of powers as proposed for the federal government. The question is if that same separation of powers in Massachusetts and it certainly appears it does from what I read as the governor is given supreme executive powers and judges are given judicial powers..
I also found this passage in Chapter III of the Massachusetts Constitution interesting.
I am curious if the legislature made other provisions and what they are.
The idea that homosexuals love each other is an obvious deception as you do not engage in self destructive behavior with those you love and homosexuality is known to be self destructive. For instance HIV/Aid is a known and preventable disease that never the less is common in the homosexual population. Encouraging such self distructive behavior is a threat to to life and health of the people of Rhode Island.
Source 1 is the article about an activist Massachusetts Judge ruling on making homosexual marriage legal in Rhode Island.
Source 2 is the Massachusetts State Constitution.
The judge is ignoring the intent of both the Rhode Island law which stresses marriage between a bride and a groom and Massachusetts law which is meant not to interfere with another states laws and put his own spin on both. That should be an impeachable offense as it is obviously a mark of bad behavior which you do not want in any official position especially the judicial branch.
The idea that Governor Romney has to enforce the court ruling as advocated by Michele Granda is contrary to the idea of separation of powers as proposed for the federal government. The question is if that same separation of powers in Massachusetts and it certainly appears it does from what I read as the governor is given supreme executive powers and judges are given judicial powers..
I also found this passage in Chapter III of the Massachusetts Constitution interesting.
Article V. All causes of marriage, divorce, and alimony, and all appeals from the judges of probate shall be heard and determined by the governor and council, until the legislature shall, by law, make other provision.
I am curious if the legislature made other provisions and what they are.
The idea that homosexuals love each other is an obvious deception as you do not engage in self destructive behavior with those you love and homosexuality is known to be self destructive. For instance HIV/Aid is a known and preventable disease that never the less is common in the homosexual population. Encouraging such self distructive behavior is a threat to to life and health of the people of Rhode Island.
Source 1 is the article about an activist Massachusetts Judge ruling on making homosexual marriage legal in Rhode Island.
Source 2 is the Massachusetts State Constitution.
posted by Kerwin | 7:52 PM
1 Comments:
Love is the denial of self. If homosexuals did that they wouldn't be homosexuals. The mere fact that they make up excuses to keep being homosexual is evidence that they are in it for themselves.
Post a Comment
<< Home