Using Roe V WadeTo Overturn Roe V Wade Part I
Here is part of my attempt to but a argument together to overthrow the Conclusion of Roe v. Wade by using Roe v. Wade as a precedent.
Argument 1: (This Section Proves The Constitution Protects The Right To Life Of Our Children Because They Are Our Posterity)
In 1989 case of MICHAEL H. ET AL. v. GERALD D. the Supreme court determined that a child by the name of Victoria D existed at the point of conception. That point occurred in September of 1980 and she was born several months later on May 11, 1981.
In the 1977 case Reyna v. City and County of San Francisco held Court of Appeals of California, First Appellate District, Division Three the court acknowledged that a child existed a conception
In the 1958 case Galper v. Galper Second District, Division One
the California courts once again acknowledged that a child existed at conception.
In other cases throughout the United States court after court acknowledges that a child exist at conception.
In the 1905 Supreme Court case JACOBSON v. COM. OF MASSACHUSETTS the court found that the preamble declares the purposes of the U.S. Constitution
In the 1793 Supreme Court case CHISHOLM v. STATE OF GEORGIA the court declared the preamble to be the peoples design in establishing the Constitution and it comprehened 6 objects for doing so.
The people of the United hold the Constitution in so much awe that in Article VI they insist that every legislative, executive, and judicial officer of both state and federal government take an oath to uphold the Constitution so that if they forsook the oath and violated the purpose for which it was established then they would be guilty of the crime of perjury.
It is the 6th object of the preamble that we concern ourselves with. It clearly states that the 6th purpose for the establishment of the Constitution is to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity”. Obviously a child is the posterity of his or her natural parents as determined by heredity and it is clear that you can not secure the blessings of a child or adult that you deliberately and arbitrarily kill. The Constitution insists that the people of the United States require the state to act in order to protect the life and liberties of a their posterity from conception on.
Argument 1: (This Section Proves The Constitution Protects The Right To Life Of Our Children Because They Are Our Posterity)
In 1989 case of MICHAEL H. ET AL. v. GERALD D. the Supreme court determined that a child by the name of Victoria D existed at the point of conception. That point occurred in September of 1980 and she was born several months later on May 11, 1981.
In the 1977 case Reyna v. City and County of San Francisco held Court of Appeals of California, First Appellate District, Division Three the court acknowledged that a child existed a conception
In the 1958 case Galper v. Galper Second District, Division One
the California courts once again acknowledged that a child existed at conception.
In other cases throughout the United States court after court acknowledges that a child exist at conception.
In the 1905 Supreme Court case JACOBSON v. COM. OF MASSACHUSETTS the court found that the preamble declares the purposes of the U.S. Constitution
In the 1793 Supreme Court case CHISHOLM v. STATE OF GEORGIA the court declared the preamble to be the peoples design in establishing the Constitution and it comprehened 6 objects for doing so.
The people of the United hold the Constitution in so much awe that in Article VI they insist that every legislative, executive, and judicial officer of both state and federal government take an oath to uphold the Constitution so that if they forsook the oath and violated the purpose for which it was established then they would be guilty of the crime of perjury.
It is the 6th object of the preamble that we concern ourselves with. It clearly states that the 6th purpose for the establishment of the Constitution is to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity”. Obviously a child is the posterity of his or her natural parents as determined by heredity and it is clear that you can not secure the blessings of a child or adult that you deliberately and arbitrarily kill. The Constitution insists that the people of the United States require the state to act in order to protect the life and liberties of a their posterity from conception on.
posted by Kerwin | 8:15 PM
1 Comments:
You have a couple of points but I am not sure what they have to do with this topic. I do know that the Declaration of Independence instructs us to be patient and use democracy and appeals to our fellow citizens before physically resisting an oppressive government. We also need to count the cost and a rebellion will not be cheap in the damage to life or health of the people or our society.
Post a Comment
<< Home