Of Border Fences And Spies
I am hoping that someone will pass on the information that the United Nations is once again interfering with internal American politics.
As proof I will offer the information that International law forbids building a wall on the border according to a July 9,2004 14-1 decision of The International Court of Justice.
The case involves Israel but can easily be applied to the United States. In the case the court commanded that Israel tear down their wall and alter their legislation. So much for the United Nations support of democracy. It sounds like they support the socialist doctrine that the people are absolutely free to do what we tell them.
My source is here.
Then there is the country of Saudi Arabia whom has decided to fence off the chaos of Iraq by building a wall over their 560 border that country. The Saudi Arabia plan is to secure all of their 3600 mile border to improve internal security and bolster it’s defense against external threats. A European diplomat in Riyadh states that the fence is a white elephant since the insurgents will get around it by using Syria.
My source is here.
George Soros who is a naturalized citizen whom was born in Hungary and wants a European style democracy in the United States is also known to favor open borders. He favors them so much that his institute the Open Society Institute gives grants to the ACLU, Mexican American Education And Legal Defense Fund, and the National Council of La Raza, To make you feel more secure the OSI also gives grants to the Democratic Party and the American Bar Association. George Soros is a known political activist whom I consider a political and cultural spy from the EU. I also believe he became a naturalized citizen so that he could legally interfere in the politics of the United States.
The Grantmakers list of organizing that OSI gives to is located here.
What this has do with the Constitution is that the Constitution and not international law is the high law of the land. The Constitution clearly states that we have the right to feel secure in our own land. The United Nation is telling us that we do not have a right to build a privacy/security fence on our own land and thus violated the right to property of the people of the United States.
As proof I will offer the information that International law forbids building a wall on the border according to a July 9,2004 14-1 decision of The International Court of Justice.
The case involves Israel but can easily be applied to the United States. In the case the court commanded that Israel tear down their wall and alter their legislation. So much for the United Nations support of democracy. It sounds like they support the socialist doctrine that the people are absolutely free to do what we tell them.
My source is here.
Then there is the country of Saudi Arabia whom has decided to fence off the chaos of Iraq by building a wall over their 560 border that country. The Saudi Arabia plan is to secure all of their 3600 mile border to improve internal security and bolster it’s defense against external threats. A European diplomat in Riyadh states that the fence is a white elephant since the insurgents will get around it by using Syria.
My source is here.
George Soros who is a naturalized citizen whom was born in Hungary and wants a European style democracy in the United States is also known to favor open borders. He favors them so much that his institute the Open Society Institute gives grants to the ACLU, Mexican American Education And Legal Defense Fund, and the National Council of La Raza, To make you feel more secure the OSI also gives grants to the Democratic Party and the American Bar Association. George Soros is a known political activist whom I consider a political and cultural spy from the EU. I also believe he became a naturalized citizen so that he could legally interfere in the politics of the United States.
The Grantmakers list of organizing that OSI gives to is located here.
What this has do with the Constitution is that the Constitution and not international law is the high law of the land. The Constitution clearly states that we have the right to feel secure in our own land. The United Nation is telling us that we do not have a right to build a privacy/security fence on our own land and thus violated the right to property of the people of the United States.
posted by Kerwin | 11:14 PM
3 Comments:
OHHH I can't stand the U.N! Is there a more worthless organization on this planet? What do they contribute? Lets see, we give them billions every year for international disaster aid, and the first thing they did when the tsunami hit was ask us for money. Where did the jillions go we've been giving you? Then there's oil for food, gang rape in third world countries, all courtesy of the U.N. The should be reduced to soilent green.
I don't think they would be healthy to eat either.;->
This is just plain typical for the United Nations. Always trying to stick their nose in the business of soverign nations. Massive illegal immigration is a globalist mind set to eliminate the borders of our American Republic. A security fence would go against the world economic policy and would hurt the chances of creating a North America Union. I have supported a new security fence since day one. I also support pulling out of the United Nations and all other world government/trade organizations and a return to the common sense America First principles of our founding fathers.
Post a Comment
<< Home