Evolution Is A Violation Of The Religious Rights Of The People Of The United States

Null hypothesis
The statistical hypothesis that one variable (e.g. whether or not a study participant was allocated to receive an intervention) has no association with another variable or set of variables (e.g. whether or not a study participant died), or that two or more population distributions do not differ from one another. In simplest terms, the null hypothesis states that the results observed in a study are no different from what might have occurred as a result of the play of chance.

At the root of Evolution v. Intelligent Design debate or more correctly the Evolution by chance v. the Evolution by intelligent design debate is the null hypothesis. All the rest of the arguments used to booster either side of the evolution debate and therefore merely a diversion. The question can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that either chance or intelligent design was the root cause of the development of the species. From everything I know you can not. Since that is so it is up to an individual to decide for themselves. Such decision by its very nature is the realm of an individuals religious beliefs.

The government has been denied the right to make that decision by the First Amendment in two ways. The first is that in making the decision they are evangelizing for a particular minority group of religions which include atheism and certain other religious beliefs. So the rights of taxpayers and teachers are being violated by their being forced to monetarily or physically support the evangelism of a religion they do not agree with. The second civil right violation is that the students are being forced to practice a religion they do not agree with. This is a violation of the free expression of religious clause.

The court backed up by a number of Congress people states the federal courts have the right to violate the rights of the people under the political theory of the evolving constitution. I make the accusation that those backing the evolving constitution are domestic enemies of the Constitution and should be fought at every step. The proof I give is that the Constitution and not court law is the high law of the land. The Constitution made no allowances for it evolving through court law but instead set up legislative means for it to be amended. The Constitution makes all governmental official including judges take an oath to uphold the Constitution. The Constitution specifies that all legislation must be done by Congress so reserving the changing of laws to that branch. The Declaration states it is the duty of all branches to guard and protect the true civil rights of the people and not destroy them.