.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Expressions of Liberty

A commentary on the governmental respect for natural human rights as expressed by the founders of the United States and how it effects us today. I also show how the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution and other related documents are not dead documents in America today, but merely ignored and misused.

Name:
Location: Champaign, Illinois, United States

I am a classical liberal which is considered a type of conservative in these modern days. I am pro-right to life, pro-right to liberty, pro-parental rights, pro-right to property and a number of other natural human rights.

Sunday, January 22, 2006

A Day The Constitution Fell To The Grief Of Many May Be Comming To An End

Read this Newsday article called “Marchers' renewed hope” by Carol Eisenberg. The cites below come from it.

Year in and year out, Marie Mawn has risen at 3 a.m. to catch the bus from St. Joseph's parish in Ronkonkoma for the annual March for Life in Washington, D.C.


She deserves respect as a diligent patriot of the pro life cause:

But this year feels different to the seasoned soldier in the anti-abortion movement: For the first time in 33 years, Mawn has a sense that historic change is at hand - the beginning of the end of the 1973 court decision that made a woman's right to abortion the law of the land.


A woman does not have the right to arbitrarily and deliberately kill a her child as the Declaration of Independence made natural law the law of the land. The Constitution merely tries to enumerate it just like it states in the Ninth Amendment. Natural law states that you are not at liberty to harm yourself or any living creature in your possession except for noble cause. In other words a woman has no right to abortion.

"I believe that the confirmation of Sam Alito to the Supreme Court is dangerous for the future health and welfare of women in this country," said JoAnn D. Smith, interim president of Planned Parenthood of Nassau County. "This is an appointment for life, which means it will probably be a generation or more who will have to live by his decisions."


So having children is dangerous for children. Considering that Planned Parenthood is really the Birth Control league and most likely changed their name in order to hide their connection to Eugenics, I am not surprised. Controlling births is the agenda of Planned Parenthood and not protecting the health and welfare of woman and don’t le them deceive you. Planned Parenthood operates in China where women are forced to have abortion and in India where thousands of women die from legal but unsafe abortions. Do the work to get antibiotics to the third world in order to save women. No rather they work to get RU486, that has numerous adverse effects even in developed countries, exported into developing countries.

When you choose your side be aware that the Birth Control League considers the human race women and all the enemy who needs to be kept in check while the other values human life. Choose wisely,

1 Comments:

Blogger highboy said...

Since neither side in the issue of abortion can prove whether a fetus is a human being or not, one would think someone who stands for human rights would want to er on the side of caution.

8:57 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home