.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Expressions of Liberty

A commentary on the governmental respect for natural human rights as expressed by the founders of the United States and how it effects us today. I also show how the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution and other related documents are not dead documents in America today, but merely ignored and misused.

Name:
Location: Champaign, Illinois, United States

I am a classical liberal which is considered a type of conservative in these modern days. I am pro-right to life, pro-right to liberty, pro-parental rights, pro-right to property and a number of other natural human rights.

Wednesday, October 19, 2005

The Government Backs The Atheist Doctrine Creation By Random Mutation

The federal courts get to decide if intelligent design can be taught in school or not after several families sued over a small exercise of it in schools as you can see in this cite from the Associated Press article " 'Intelligent Design' Advocate Testifies" by Martha Raffaele. Eight families sued to have intelligent design removed from the biology curriculum, contending the policy essentially promotes the Bible's view of creation and therefore violates the constitutional separation of church and state.

I am going to ignore the fact that legally this case should only be tried in state courts as it is clearly not within federal jurisdiction. Instead I am going to attack Evolution as an Atheistic doctrine of creation. In fact the real question is not Evolution v. Intelligent design but it is random chance v. intelligent design.

It is no surprise that according to the cite below the champions of the Secular denomination of the Atheistic religion, the ACLU, are involved in the case as is the AUSCS.

The plaintiffs are represented by a team put together by the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation of Church and State. The school district is being represented by the Thomas More Law Center, a public-interest firm based in Ann Arbor, Mich., that says its mission is to defend the religious freedom of Christians.
Thomas More Center is correct in that evolution is a clear violation of the religious non-establishment clause. This is because the non-establishment clause was placed in the Bill of Rights to protect citizens of United States from supporting a doctrine they did not agree with. When the Antipaedobaptist churches in New England sent Isaac Backus to the First Congress of the United States he carried an introduction that carried to following plea for religious freedom.

according to the dictates of Protestantism, we claim and expect the liberty of worshipping God according to our consciences, not being obliged to support a ministry we cannot attend, whilst we demean ourselves as faithful subjects.

Even though years have passed a significant number of people of the United States are still desirous of the same freedom from religious oppression whether it be Atheism, Christianity, or some other religion. It is better to give consideration to all theories of creation, Than to embrace any religions specific doctrine such as Evolution.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home