Those Who Embrace The Evolving Constitution Doctrine Are Criminals

All individuals, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, takes the following oath as stated in the federal codes at Title 5 Part III Subpart B Chap. 33 Subchap. 2 Sec. 3331.

``I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.''

The President takes this oath that is written in the Constitution at the end of Article 2 Section 1.

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Those that violate their oath are committing the federal crime of perjury described below.

Title 18 Part I Chap. 79 Sec. 1621. Perjury generally Whoever-- (1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or (2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he
does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.

The doctrine of an evolving Constitution is endorsed by a number of individuals which according to reports include Senators Kennedy, Feinstein, Schumer, and Biden. Their doctrine conflicts with their oath to defend the Constitution making them guilty of the crime of perjury as I intend to prove below.

My proof is based on the assumption is that those endorsing the doctrine of an evolving Constitution have a competent knowledge of the Constitution. If they do not they should not be making a Constitutional oath.

The doctrine of evolving constitution is based upon the change in the meaning of Constitution of the constitution as new federal court precedents are set by the private interpretation of the Supreme Court Justices..

The errors in this doctrine that make those that follow it and vow to defend the Constitution criminals and guilty of perjury are that:

1. All legislative powers are Congresses and so the Supreme Court has no power of authority to make changes in the meaning of the Constitution. Article 1 Section 1
2. The Supreme Court is limited to just the Judicial power and thus only has the power to judge according to the law and not the power to intentionally alter the law. Article 3 Section 1
3. If due to erroneous judgment the Supreme Court does change the meaning of the Constitution it is up to them to correct their error at the first opportunity since statue law always supersedes court law.
4. The only legal ways for the Constitutional meaning or words to change is if a super majority of both Congress and the state legislatures act to change it or the states convene a Continental Congress and three fourths of the states ratify it. Article 5
5. The Constitution does not give legal authority to the federal courts to change either in meaning or word any part of the Constitution. Read the whole Constitution and you will find this is true.
   

According to Alexander Hamilton’s Federation paper #78 The legislative. the executive branches have the responsibility of not enforcing the mistake and challenging it by lawsuit, legislation, or other action. Those members of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of state and federal government have an obligation to uphold their oaths and seek to remove the individuals who practice this doctrine from office because they are a domestic enemy of the United States Constitution. Urge your elected representatives to be loyal to their oaths and oppose anti-constitutional activism wherever it rears its ugly head.